.

Here, gathered in our beloved South Dakota, are a few members of our Williamson / Mattson Clan. Charles and Luella are to be blamed (be kind, they didn't know what they were doing). We're generally a happy bunch and somewhat intelligent (notwithstanding our tenuous grasp on reality). I'm also proud to say that most of us still have our teeth.
Showing posts with label Mattson / McCrilles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mattson / McCrilles. Show all posts

Saturday, September 1, 2012

More on our McCrillis Line. An Email from a Distant Cousin.

From the Fortress of Solitude
Pleasant Grove

Hello All,

I received an email from Muiris McCrillis, a distant McCrillis cousin, concerning our McCrillis line.   We join the McCrillis line through Grandma Violet.  This is the exact linage.

We join into the clan through my GG Grandmother, Isabel D. McCrillies.  The email with additional information about our McCrillis family is below.

Simply,
Victor

McCrillises are MacNeils. Although the former Clan Chief, Ian Roderick MacNeil, did formally acknowledge us as a blood-sept of the Barra MacNeils (the only one of the MacNeil clans still intact) in 1991, I wouldn't look at it so much as the MacNeils "taking us in" as us receiving formal, written recognition from Ian MacNeil that we ARE MacNeils.  This fact tends to confuse many inside and outside the family. Afterall, clearly "McCrillis" looks and sounds nothing like "MacNeil", right? Well, the problem is that unless you understand that our ancestors spoke a different language in the old days and unless you understand the orthography of that language, you're not going to see the very clear evidence. Case in point is your own surname: Williamson. William is actually Uilleim. Son of William would be MacUilleim. That's what it was until it was rendered into English, anyway (in the Williamsons' case likely in the late medieval period because of a proximity to England). Most of these anglicizations, however, took place during the colonization of New England. The United States is fraught with such examples of Gaelic surnames that have been wrent and wrested into English by monoglots.  Unfortunately, instead of seeing a modern reversal of this trend which one would expect would compliment the Gaelic revival, modern Scottophilia and consumerism have coupled to produce consumer nostalgia for clans, tartans, military piping and haggis, especially in the US. However, the tartan system was devised by two Polish brothers, military piping was invented by English King George, haggis is a lowland food and the clan system went defunct when Scotland conceded to the Unionism. Even Ian Roderick, Attorney at Law, of Chicago, Ill., reclaimed the chieftainship of the MacNeils through the legal maneuver of tanistry.  You know, Victor, I was inspired by the way you honored our 5th generation grandfather, Robert, with the historical details about his service in the Revolution. You seem to realize that our pride is our people, as I did when I visited Robert's gravesite this weekend on the anniversary of his death. But without our language, we are adrift and no other beacon but that language will gather us again.  As I stood there alone in the small, rock-encircled McCrillis Cemetary in Corinth, saddened that the grass was overgrown, that many of the stones were broken and that most of the writing on the stones was washed away by time, much like our Gaelic language, I did think of your website and I was happy that someone cared.  
Tapadh leibh is le meas,  
Muiris  

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Our Cousin at the Battle of Bunker Hill. Mattson, McCrillis Line






From the Fortress of Solitude
Pleasant Grove

Hello All,
The middle of August and the temperatures are still in the mid 90s here in Utah Valley.  I'm anxious for Autumn and cooler weather.  I think most Americans are ready to see the back side of the summer of 2012.  

Today in our digital family reunion we discover a 1st cousin 7 times removed who fought and died in the battle of Bunker Hill at the start of the Revolutionary War.  

I begin with the Relationship Chart:  


William McCrillis (1749 - 1775)
is your 1st cousin 7x removed
Father of William
Father of Willaim
Son of John
Son of Daniel
Son of Robert
Son of John K.
Daughter of Joseph
Daughter of Isabel Deanora
Daughter of Vesta Althea

Violet married Walter Mattson
to
Luella, Linda, John and Marvin
to
Us


Cousin William McCrillis served in Capt. Simon Marston’s Company.  Capt. Marston was under Colonel Joshua Wingate.  William enlisted on Apr. 23, 1775 and served 2 months 17 days.  Killed in the Battle of Bunker Hill. 






The Battle of Bunker Hill

The sun was shining from a cloudless sky a little past noon on June 17, 1775 when a British force of 1500 men landed on Charlestown Heights in Massachusetts. Their objective: a surprise attack to nullify the threat posed by "rebel" batteries on the peninsula.  However, the night before   for nearly twelve hours   the Americans had worked non-stop building their main fortification on Breed's Hill which lay at the foot of Bunker Hill to the north.

At daybreak on the 17th gazing through the morning fog, British General Howe was astonished to see a six-foot high earthwork   a mushroom fortress   that seemingly appeared overnight. "The rebels," he exclaimed, "have done more work in one night than my whole army would have done in one month." British cannons immediately opened fire from the ships offshore but the patriots continued work on the intrenchments without harm.
By mid-afternoon General Howe ordered his troops to advance and open fire. As the British moved forward, the Americans remained as silent as the tomb. "Don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes," was the order passed along the lines. When that moment came, the word "FIRE!" was shouted, and whole enemy platoons were mowed down and shattered, retreating to the foot of the hill.


Howe rallied his forces and repeated the attack with the same crushing results. Not to be discouraged, Howe rallied his men a third time, ordering them to use only their bayonets. After a desperate hand-to-hand struggle, the Americans were driven out.
In that final assault American General Joseph Warren and British Major John Pitcairn were killed. While the exact number of casualties varies among historians, the Americans were estimated at 441 killed and wounded... with the British casualties at 1,150 killed and wounded.

In all of the twenty battles of the Revolution, Bunker Hill exacted a heavy toll on British officers. In this one battle alone one-eighth of the British officers in the entire War were killed and one-sixth were wounded on that day.

Following the earlier skirmishes at Lexington and Concord, the battle of Bunker Hill was significant in that it overruled any real hope of conciliation. The outcome of the battle rallied the colonies and moved a lethargic Congress to take action. Bunker Hill showed the Americans that the British were not invincible. It showed the British Government that the "rebels" were a serious opponent, that "the mightiest army in all of Europe" had a real fight on its hands.


Sunday, June 3, 2012

More on our McCrillis Ancestors. Mattson Line

From the Fortress of Solitude
Pleasant Grove

Hello All,
One of our distant McCrillis cousins emailed me this week with additional information on our McCrillis ancestors.  His email follows:

Hi folks. My name is Maury McCrillis. I'm the last of the Scots Gaelic speaking McCrillises and a direct descendent of Robert, our ancestor who served in the Revolution. My great uncle Herbert O. McCrillis wrote the seminal genealogy of the McCrillis families in America, an early copy of which I still make reference to for those interested in our early history. I'm happy to report that your information about Robert is spot-on accurate. Robert's father, as you say, was Daniel. Daniel's two other brothers were John and David. Our original progenitor, their father, was also named John. The original John came from Aghadowey (pronounced AHK-ah-doo-ee), having relocated from Scotland, likley Dumbartonshire, in or around 1690 following a Covenanter defeat at the Battle of Bothwell Bridge. He and the sons arrived at Nodle Island, Boston, in 1726 and about 20 years later build what is the original homestead, which still stands on McCrillis Road in Nottingham, NH. Anyone interested in more details about our early history can contact me at mccrillisancestry@hotmail.com
Le Dùrachdan, Muiris (Maury) 

I've written to Maury McCrillis asking for more information on our McCrillis ancestors and will pass the information along when it arrives.

In Maury's email he mentioned "a Covenanter defeat at the Battle of  Bothwell Bridge.."  I did a bit of research on the Battle of Bothwell Bridge and will share in today's post.

We begin with a Relationship Chart so you can see how we are related to John McCrillis.

John McCrillis (1675 - 1743)
is your 7th great grandfather
Son of John
Son of Daniel
Son of Robert
Son of John Kenney
Daughter of Joseph E.
Daughter of Isabella Denora
Daughter of Vesta Althea
Violet married Walter Mattson
to
Luella, Linda, John and Marvin
to 
US
One interesting side note, my research shows that our 7th Great Grandfather, John was born in Londonderry, Ireland.  The email above clearly states that he was born a Scotsman and possibly a Covenanter.  Regardless, it is clear that the McCrillis family came from Scotland to Ireland around 1690 and then to Boston in 1726.

The Covenanters

Simply stated, the Covenanters were those people in Scotland who signed the National Covenant in 1638. They signed this Covenant to confirm their opposition to the interference by the Stuart kings in the affairs of the Presbyterian Church of Scotland.

The Stuart kings harboured the belief of the Divine Right of the Monarch. Not only did they believe that God wished them to be the infallible rulers of their kingdom - they also believed that they were the spiritual heads of the Church of Scotland. This latter belief could not be accepted by the Scots. No man, not even a king, could be spiritual head of their church. Only Jesus Christ could be spiritual head of a Christian church.

This was the nub of the entire Covenanting struggle. The Scots were, and would have been, loyal to the Stuart dynasty but for that one sticking point, and from 1638, when the Covenant was signed, until the Glorious Revolution - when Prince William of Orange made a bloodless invasion of Great Britain in 1688 - a great deal of suffering, torture, imprisonment, transportation and executions would ensue.

King Charles I had introduced the Book of Common Prayer to Scotland in 1637 to the fury and resentment of the populace. He declared that opposition to the new liturgy would be treason, and thus came about the Covenant.

 There followed a period of very severe repression. Ministers with Covenanting sympathies were "outed" from their churches by the authorities, and had to leave their parishes. Many continued to preach at "conventicles" in the open air or in barns and houses. This became an offence punishable by death. Citizens who did not attend their local churches (which were now in the charge of Episcopalian "curates") could be heavily fined, and such offenders were regarded as rebels, who could be questioned, even under torture. They could be asked to take various oaths, which not only declared loyalty to the king, but also to accept his as head of the church. Failure to take such an oath could result in summary execution by the muskets of the dragoons, who were scouring the districts looking for rebels.

The persecutions became more frequent and cruel on the Restoration of Charles II in 1660. As time went on more and more ordinary folk became involved, and skirmishes and battles took place against Government troops. In 1678 the Government raised an army of 6,000 Highlanders, who had no love for the Presbyterian lowlanders. This army swept through the west and south of Scotland, looting and plundering. They remained for many years, quartering themselves on the already impoverished Covenanters

Taken from http://www.covenanter.org.uk)

The Battle of Bothwell Bridge.  Sunday 22, June 1679.
  
At the close of the half-hour, or, as some reports say, before it, the royal troops opened fire upon the bridge. They had planted three cannon behind a parapet that had been thrown up during the cessation from fighting, but their firing was too high, and went over the heads of the Covenanters, who, with their one piece, replied so effectively that they killed several of the Royalists and drove them from their guns. David Leslie shouted after them as they fled, "Would they fleg for country fellows?" but still they ran; and the cannon would have been taken had not the barricade on the bridge barred the way for bringing them over.

New troops were brought up and renewed the attack, but still without success--the three hundred bravely defended the bridge.  For three hours they stood unflinchingly. The reinforcements they sent for to Hamilton Moor never arrived; their ammunition ran short, and messengers were despatched for more, when the answer came that there was none to spare, and that they must retire to the main body on the moor. "With sore hearts" they withdrew, for they felt that the bridge was everything, although Hamilton believed it was wasting time to defend it, and that the best course would be to let the enemy form on its south side, and then drive them into the Clyde.

They fell back in good order, and the royal troops at once crossed the bridge and formed upon the moor. When Rathillet and his brave companions retired to the main body he found them, he says, well drawn up, and very hearty, and all ready to march down upon the enemy. For the moment their divisions had ceased, "and every one seemed to encourage the other." Wyck's picture of the battle presents them as drawn up in eleven different squares, with six standards, two detachments of horse, one cannon, and a body of skirmishers in front. All appeared in a measure prepared, as they assured Hackston, for a battle "with hand strokes," when, just as they had begun to advance, a cry got up, which ran from company to company, that their leaders, who seem largely to have been friends of Welch, had disappeared.

To some extent the report was true, for Paton and Cleland were then doing their best to find officers to take their place. But there was no time to reason, for while the cry was running through the army, the horse, under Weir of Greenridge, made a movement of their own from the centre to the front of the left wing. The officer in command ordered them out of the way, but they cried out that they would not, as they had been placed where they had been to be cut off, and then, as if struck with some sudden madness of fear, they wheeled about, 140 horse, dashed through the left wing, broke it in pieces, and carried it away in their flight.

At that moment the cannon of the Royalists began to play, and their line made an advance, but there was no fighting; only 15 men were slain on the field of battle. The panic on the left wing spread to the right, and it speedily fled in like manner, Sir Robert Hamilton among the foremost, "leaving the world to debate," says one who was there, "whether he acted most like a traitor, coward, or fool." The royal troops, that stood in awe so long as there was any opposition, at once advanced when they saw their opponents flee without fighting, and eagerly gave chase, and slew nearly 400 of the fugitives as they fled before them. No quarter seems to have been given, save to 1200 who surrendered in a body and who were later imprisoned in Greyfriars' Churchyard.



From The Martyr Graves of Scotland by J. H. Thomson, 1875. [adapted]

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Our 21st Great Grandmother Isabella, "The She Wolf". A True Ancestor to the Iron Willed Women in Our Family.


From the Fortress of Solitude
Pleasant Grove

Hello All,
Strong willed, stubborn, frightful - all terms I've heard to describe the majority of the females in this family. One contributing source of these character traits could be our 21st Great Grandmother Isabella, The She Wolf" of France.

We begin with the Relationship Chart


Isabella "the She-Wolf" De France (1292 - 1358)
is your 21st great grandmother
Son of Isabella "the She-Wolf"
Son of Edward III , King of England
Daughter of Thomas Woodstock Gloucester
Son of Anne of Gloucester
Son of William
Son of Fulke
Son of John
Daughter of John
Son of Elizabeth
Son of Richard
Son of Aquila
Daughter of Aquila
Son of Sarah
Son of Abraham
Son of John
Daughter of Ezra
Son of Abigail
Daughter of Phineas
Daughter of Elmira
Daughter of Isabella Denora
Daughter of Vesta Althea. Violet married Walter Mattson
to their children
Luella, Linda, John and Marvin
to
Us

First a summary on her life.
Isabella, one of history’s most notorious femme fatales, a much maligned Queen of England.

Isabella of France, Edward II’s queen, was a woman much maligned in her day. Today, it is said that her maniacal laughter can be heard on stormy nights at Castle Rising in Norfolk, and that in the ruins of the 14th century church where she is buried, her angry ghost can be glimpsed, clutching the beating heart of her murdered husband. In literature she has fared no better; Christopher Marlowe’s “unnatural Queen, false Isabel” has also been described as “a woman of evil character, a notorious schemer,” and as the “She-Wolf of France.” Tragic, cruel, tormented: how did Isabella acquire such a reputation?

Born in 1292, the daughter of Philip IV of France and sister to three future French kings, Isabella was a pawn in the game of international politics. She was married at the age of twelve to Edward II of England, thus beginning a public and private life more turbulent and eventful than any heroine, or anti-heroine, in fiction.

Through a long period of civil war, Isabella bore Edward four children but was constantly humiliated by his relationships with male favourites. Although she is known to have lived adulterously with Roger Mortimer, 1st Earl of March, accusations of murder and regicide remain unsubstantiated. Had it not been for her unfaithfulness, history may have immortalized her as a liberator — the savior who unshackled England from a weak and vicious monarch.

The History of our 21st Great Grandmother Isabella, The She Wolf of France.
Isabella of France was born in 1295, the youngest daughter of King Phillip IV of France. Bethrothed as an infant to Edward II of England, the marriage was delayed as Edward I disapproved. It was not until after he died that Isabella, then eleven or twelve, finally met her betrothed. She sailed to England to get married in 1308.

Isabella was young even for a bride at that time, being only eleven when she was sent to her husband. Already a noted beauty, descriptions of her make it seem that she was slender and pale skinned. Unfortunately her husband, nine years older, had little time for her.

She was outraged to find her jewels had been taken from her and given to Edward's first favourite, Piers Gaveston, who wore them at the wedding.

Unfortunately this would prove a pattern, as Edward far prefered the company of his favourites to his wife, and often rewarded them at her expense. Gaveston was a commoner, which rankled further, and quickly gained a reputation as a corrupt and greedy man. Worse, he and Edward were sworn brothers, which meant that they shared their possessions - unthinkable when the stability of a throne was at stake.

In 1310-11 Edward launched a campaign against Scotland, which failed dismally. After his disastrous invasion of Scotland, Edward fled with his favourite, Piers Gaveston.

The result was massive unrest in England. In the aftermath of the disaster in Scotland, the Barons took their chance and raised an army against the King to try and remove the hated Gaveston. When he was seperated from Edward, Gaveston was surrounded and captured at Scarborough Castle.

When they captured Gaveston in 1312, there was brief wrangling over his fate, and then he was executed by the barons for his corruption.

This brought Isabella a brief period during which her marriage was more peaceful. Three of the couple's children were born during this period, including the longed-for son and heir who would become Edward III.

During this time a scandal erupted in France in 1314. The wives of Isabella's brothers were caught having affairs, which as one brother was the King of France and one was the heir, was treason. Isabella was a witness against them and both women were imprisoned for life, the marriages dissolved.

Isabella's peace was not to last. In 1318 Edward II took a new favourite, Hugh le Despenser, who proved worse than Gaveston. The period of their influence is referred to in English history as the "Tyranny".

Hugh le Despenser's greed rapidly outgrew Gaveston's. He stole lands from relatives, disinheriting them. There were rumours that he tortured one heiress until she lost her mind and then confiscated her lands on grounds of insanity. He boasted of his cruelty and influence and rapidly became as hated as Gaveston had been.

In 1322 despite losses like the Battle of Bannockburn in 1314, Edward launched another campaign against the Scots. This time, when the action failed, he fled with Despenser, leaving Queen Isabella and her ladies at the mercy of the Scots. Facing torture, with two of her ladies killed, Isabella escaped by sea in a dangerous voyage, evading the Flemish navy.

Exiled briefly at the demand of Isabella and the Barons after the Scots campaing, Despenser turned to piracy. This earned him a death sentence in France, although as the King of France was Isabella's brother it was already an unsafe land for him to travel in. Despite this proof of Despenser's character, Edward quickly overruled his advisers and brought his favourite home.

Despenser's retaliation was simple. Isabella's lands were confiscated and she was placed under house arrest. This removed a rival for the King's attentions, and by playing on the suspicion that as a Frenchwoman she would not be loyal to England, he undermined her support. Even her household staff were changed to those of his choosing.

In 1325 events reached a head. Some say at the urgings of Despenser, Edward II refused to pay homage to the King of France over the French lands he held. Charles IV of France confiscated them.

Queen Isabella used the debacle of the loss of Edward's lands in France in 1325 as a chance to press for a diplomatic mission to her brother, ostensibly to get the lands back.

Edward II was unable to take Despenser to France, as Despenser would be executed for piracy. If the King left him behind, without the King's protection the Barons would kill Despenser as they had Gaveston. Queen Isabella was sent in his stead.

An agreement was made between the King of France and his sister that her son, the heir to the throne would do homage in his father's place. Edward II sent him across. This was a mistake. With her son safe in France, Isabella refused to return unless Hugh Le Despenser was exiled. Worse, she joined forces with Roger Mortimer, England's then greatest General, who was in exile in France after he escaped the Tower of London and execution by the Despensers.

Edward II demanded that the French king compel her to return. Charles IV's famous response was not to his liking:

When her husband refused to exile Despenser, Isabella raised an army and with Roger Mortimer she invaded in 1327. Her brother's support was limited, perhaps because of the debacle with his first wife in 1314, and so their force was mainly made up of mercenaries.

The two had a tiny army of 1,500 and Edward felt no great concern. However when Isabella landed, the Barons took her side - not least the one who raised an army, sacked one of the Despenser's castles and presented her with the treasury.

Hugh Le Despenser, his father and Edward II tried to flee. The majority of their followers deserted them, and they were split up. Despenser's father, who had encouraged his son's actions, was caught and hanged.

The King was captured and imprisoned as was Despenser. In 1326 Hugh the Despenser was sentenced to death by torture (hanging drawing quartering and mutilation) for treason and for causing discord between the King and Queen. The execution was performed to public celebration.

For an idea of how popular Edward's favourites were with the common people, in a time when creating book pages involved days of painstaking work, both their executions were carefully recorded for posterity.

Edward II was deposed and imprisoned. In 1327 it is widely believed he was murdered in prison by means of a red hot poker.

His son, Edward III, took the throne under his mother's regency. He was only fourteen so under age to hold it in his own right. However he disapproved of Roger Mortimer who formed a close relationship with his mother. The dislike went both ways, and Mortimer did not treat the young king well.

Edward III began to suspect (probably correctly) that Mortimer planned to kill him. To prevent this, immediately after he came of age, he overthrew the regency and executed Mortimer despite his mother's pleas.

The traditional story is that Isabella went mad from grief and was banished from court, but this seems to have been a medieval chronicler's imagination, as she was known to have joined an convent, a usual retirement for widows or noble ladies who sought seclusion from the world. She was also known to have made many visits to her son's court, which is unlikely if she had actually been banished.

When she eventually died in 1358, despite having taken the nun's habit and joined the order of the Poor Clares, she was buried in her wedding dress.

Her son, Edward III, would become widely renowned as one of England's strongest monarchs.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

The Rev. John Lothrop (Lathrop). Our 9th Great Grandfather.


From the Fortress of Solitude
Pleasant Grove

Hello All,
Tonight in our digital reunion we gather around the fire to hear about our 9th Great Grandfather the Rev. John Lathrop.

I begin by confessing that I can't be 100% sure about this connection to the Rev. John Lathrop because
Sarah Martha Crippen's correct parentage of cannot be ascertained with complete accuracy, and may never be. After spending several hours researching the Crippen line over several days I've come to the conclusion that while I cannot identify her parents with complete accuracy, I feel strongly that Sarah Martha Crippen is related either as a daughter, niece or cousin to James Osborn Crippen, who was the first Crippen in that part of Tennessee where Sarah was born (and around the same time). Therefore, I am sure the Crippen line I identify below is correct to John Lathrop.

Did I make that as clear as mud?

That being said, let's take a moment to look at the Relationship Chart to our 9th Great Grandfather.


John Lathrop
(1584 - 1653)
is your 9th great grandfather
Daughter of John
Son of Jane
Daughter of John
Son of Thankful
Son of John
Daughter of ?James Osborn Crippen
Son of Sarah Martha
Daughter of John Mayberry
Daughter of Vesta Althea
Daughter of Volet Mae
You are the son of Luella

There are few men that came to America in the 1600s who contributed so many seeds to the religious, political, and business development of America. Among Rev. John’s descendants are four American presidents, Governors, United States Senator, Congressmen, a Secretary of State of the United States, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, founder of the Mormon Church, directors of the CIA, Prime Minister of Canada, Financier, renown Poet, Artist, Philanthropist, Actress, and last but not least a Revolutionary War hero court-marshaled for treason.

The following biography of The Rev. John Lathrop is taken in large part from the book Genealogical Memoir of the Lo-Lathrop Family in this Country written by Rev. E.B. Huntington and published by Mrs. Julia M. Huntington in 1884.
Rev. John Lathrop son of Thomas Lathrop and Mary _?_ was baptized in Etton, Yorkshire, England, December 20, 1584. He remained in the East Riding area of Yorkshire, England until he left for higher education. He was educated at Queen’s College, Cambridge, where he was “matriculated” in 1601, graduated B.A. in 1605, M.A. in 1609. His first and only charge of the Church of England was a parish in the County of Kent about 1614.

At that time King Charles I was in a conflict with Parliament. Puritans Presbyterians and Independents, all dissenters from the Church of England supported Parliament. This conflict led up to the English Civil War and King Charles I was beheaded in 1649 by forces led by Lord Cromwell.”

Rev. John Lathrop eventually ministered to a group of dissenters. A group of nonconformists started meeting in London in 1616, led by Rev. Henry Jacob. Rev. John Lathrop left the Church of England in 1623 and soon succeeded Rev. Henry Jacob who was the independent minister and pastor of The First Independent Church in London, England. Those he ministered to had no place of public worship and had to meet in secret since their worship itself was illegal. In April 1632 during a meeting for the faithful, their worship was invaded and forty-two of those in attendance were seized. Rev. Lathrop and the members were imprisoned in the old Clink prison in Newgate. In spring of 1634 all were released except for the Rev. Lathrop.

While in prison, his wife, Hannah Howse, became sick and died. He was granted the right to visit his wife and commend her to God before her death. Upon his return to prison his children made known to the bishop at Lambeth of their poor miserable condition with their mother’s death and father’s imprisonment. The bishop arranged the release of Rev John Lathrop and he was then banished to America.
As a result of the political conflict Rev. Lathrop and his followers are considered to be martyrs for “Independency” and freedom from religious prosecution. They suffered loss of property, imprisonment in “loftily jails” while being separated from their families. They were people willing to pay the price for freedom to serve God as to their consciences.


On September 18, 1634 Gov. Winthrop’s Journal, in Boston Massachusetts, reads, “The Griffin and another ship now arriving with about 200 passengers. Mr. Lathrop and Mr. Sims, two godly ministers coming in the same ship.” The Rev. John Lathrop arrived in Boston with a portion of his London flock and found preparations had already begun to welcome him to a new home in Scituate. “A small log cabin on Meeting House Lane served as the first church. The site is marked today by a monument that lists the early members of the parish, ‘The Men of Kent,’ and by gravestones from the 17th century." He soon married his second wife Anna _?_.

Rev. John’s time at Scituate did not always go well. He and some of the church members had a difference in opinion over the question of baptism and in 1639 he was removed. The Rev. John and a large number from Scituate arrived in Barnstable, Massachusetts on Cape Cod October 11, 1639 bringing with them crops they had raised at Scituate. They did not forget that the main reason for their pilgrimage from the motherland was for the service and glory of God. The Rev. John was the first minister of Barnstable.

At Barnstable, Rev. John’s family lived in a small house he had built on four acres which was too small and too uncomfortable for his family. The small house stood where the “Eldriges’s hotel stands today” according to writings of Rev. E. B. Huntington in 1884. His second home was a much more substantial building and he moved into the new home in 1644 This home today is the oldest part of the Sturgis Library in Barnstable. Rev. John’s bible is now on public display in the Lothrop Room of the Sturgis Library.

Rev. Lathrop was described as a “good and true man, an independent thinker, and a man who held opinions in advance of his times”. It is written that during his fourteen years at Barnstable his influence over the people was so strong that a civil magistrate was not needed to restrain crime. Upon becoming a member of the church the new applicant signed a confession of faith to keep God’s commandments, live a pure life, and walk in love with the brethren.

There are examples of Rev. John’s writings in archives today. He made many entries in the church records. He made his last entry in the church records June 15, 1653. He died in Barnstable November 8, 1653 leaving an unsigned will, which was admitted to probate. In the will he left his wife Anna his new dwelling house. His sons John in England and Benja each a cow and £5. Daughters Jane and Barbara had their portions already. The rest of his and his wife’s children received a cow. To each child a book to be chosen according to their age. The rest of his “library was to be sold to an honest man who can tell how to use it” with the proceeds to be divided. The inventory estimated the rest of the library to be worth £5.

Saturday, December 31, 2011

Alexander Gordon, Our 9th Great Grandfather. Another link to Scotland (Mattson / McCrillis Line)

From the Fortress of Solitude
Pleasant Grove

Hello All,
I didn't get much sleep last night due to a fierce north wind which blew in around 11:10 P.M. The cold wind blew out the high pressure system which had been parked over Utah for the last few weeks (It reached 57 degrees yesterday, an all time high). This will be the driest December in Utah's recorded history. The mountains have a dusting of snow, far below normal. This could be a problem for our water supplies if this weather pattern continues. Last year we were buried in snow. What a change one year can make.

Tonight in our digital family reunion we close this year with a posting on our 9th Great Grandfather, Alexander Gordon.

RELATIONSHIP CHART

Alexander Gordon (1635 - 1697)
is our 9th great grandfather
to
Nicholas Gordon (1666 - 1748)
Son of Alexander
to
Elizabeth Gordon (1694 - 1766)
Daughter of Nicholas
to
Betsey Dudley (1724 - 1810)
Daughter of Elizabeth
to
Betsey Hill (1762 - 1797)
Daughter of Betsey
to
Deborah Dearborn (1785 - 1874)
Daughter of Betsey
to
Elmira Swift (1809 - 1903)
Daughter of Deborah
to
Isabella Denora McCrillis (1851 - 1896)
Daughter of Elmira
to
Vesta Althea Dennis (1892 - 1978)
Daughter of Isabella Denora
to
Volet Mae Pierce (1918 - 1987) Married Walter Mattson
to
Luella, Linda, John, Marvin
to
Us

Grandfather Alexander gives our family another anchor in Scotland where Gordon is a common name.

Alexander Gordon was born in Aberdeen Scotland in 1635. At the age of sixteen he was a young soldier in General Monk’s army in 1651 which marched with the purpose to place Charles II as king on the English throne which was vacant because of the execution of his father King Charles I.

General Monk

On September 3 1651, roughly 12,000 Royalist of General Monk's army were holed up in the English town of Worcester. This became known as the "Battle of Worcester". During the 10 hour battle, 3,000 were killed and 7,000 taken prisoner.


The Battle of Worcester took place on 3 September 1651 at Worcester, England and was the final battle of the English Civil War. Oliver Cromwell and the Parliamentarians defeated the Royalist, predominantly Scottish, forces of King Charles II. The 16,000 Royalist forces were overwhelmed by the 28,000 strong "New Model Army" of Cromwell

Grandfather Alexander was captured by English Soldiers led by Oliver Cromwell and was jailed as a prisoner of war at Tothill Fields prison near St. Margaret’s church in London, England. Alexander was held prisoner through the winter of 1651 and 1652. Daniel Stone of Cambridge, England secured his release from prison in the spring of 1652 on condition that he be deported to the colonies.

That year Alexander sailed to America aboard the ship Liberty, a ship commanded by Captain John Allen. The Liberty landed in Boston. Alexander paid for his passage with a six year bound labor contract with John Cloyes, another name for the bound labor contract was indentured servitude. As part of his contract Alexander was confined to Watertown, Massachusetts. John Cloyes sold Alexander's apprenticeship to Samuel Stratton in October of 1652 without credit to Alexander for his first year worked. Alexander appealed to the court twice. On his second appeal, Alexander was released from his contract.

Alexander then moved to Exeter, New Hampshire and found employment at a sawmill owned by Nicholas Lissen. Nicholas Lissen then is our 10th Great Grandfather. He was born in Scotland, then emigrated to Ireland and from there to the American Colonies. In October 10, 1664 he married Nicholas Lissen's daughter, Mary in Exeter, New Hampshire and was given twenty acres of land as dowry by his father-in-law. He received a grant of land of twenty acres from Exeter on 10 October 1664 which was adjacent to the land given to him by Nicholas Lissen. Mary and Alexander had eight children, 2 daughters and 6 sons.

In 1675 Alexander enlisted the New Hampshire militia to help defend the colony against the Indian chief, King Philip. In 1695, at the age of 60, Alexander again enlisted in the militia, serving in Capt. Kingsley Hall's company in "King Williams War". Alexander eventually owned several sawmills.

Alexander died in Exeter, New Hampshire in 1697 at the age of 62.

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Our 10th Great Grand Uncle, Son in Law to William Shakespeare (Mattson/ Pierce / McCrillis Lines)

William Shakespeare

From the Fortress of Solitude
Pleasant Grove

Hello All,
Today we learn about our family's connection to William Shakespeare. This connection may not be 100% definite (what really is when you go this far back along a family tree) but my finding is based on sound judgement which I shall explain.

I begin with what I know....

We know that our Robert McCrillis is our 5th Great Grandfather. Robert was married to our 5th Great Grandmother, Mary Canney. As of 4:00 P.M. this afternoon I hadn't a clue who Mary's parents were. My afternoon goal was to discover her parents and push this family line back to where it disappears into the fog of history.

Our records show that Mary Canney was born in Lebanon Maine. I then found this passage from a book entitled Soldiers of the American Revolution of Lebanon Maine.

I believe that John Canney is a brother of our Great Grandmother Mary. John was born in 1744 and Mary in 1745. I believe our record stating that she was born in Lebanon is incorrect. I believe Mary was born in Dover N.H. and moved to Lebanon with her family. In the passage above is says, "The Father, Samuel, removed from Dover, N.H. to Lebanon about 1747, where he became the first settler within the township". How many Canney families would there be in Lebanon, Maine if Samuel Canney was the first settler in the township in 1747(ish)?

The entire text from the book mentioned above reads:
JOHN CANNEY (Kenney), b. at Dover, N. H., 24 Aug., 1744, was a son of Samuel and Susannah Canney of Dover, N. H., and Lebanon. The father, Samuel, removed from Dover, N. H., to Lebanon about 1747, where he became the Jirst settler within the township. The son, John Canney, enlisted as a private in Capt. Jedediah Goodwin's Co. of Col. Edward Wigglesworth's Reg't. He was in the same company of which Ichabod Cowell was lieutenant, and "Parson" Hasey's diary shows that on "22 July, 1776, our men [Lebanon men] with Lieut. Cowell set out for Canada." His dis-
charge was dated at Albany 30 Nov., 1776.

As a selectman he rendered services in 1770, 1771, 1772 and in 1780, 1781, 1782. He removed from the original Canney farm now (1896) owned and occupied by David W. Varney to the farm now (1896) owned and occupied by Samuel Shapleigh. He was engaged in farming and lumbering until his death which occurred about 1799. He was buried in the "Camp Hill" Cemetery, but the inscription on his supposed stone is unintelligible. In 1782 he was chosen lieutenant of the town militia and a little later Colonel, by which title he was called.

He married Mrs. Elizabeth (Thompson) McCrillis, the widow of Daniel McCrillis of Lebanon. She had no children by Canney, and lived to be 96 years of age. Her children by Daniel McCrillis were : Robert; John, who m. 25 Nov., 1765, Mary Garland ; Elizabeth, who m. 25 Oct., 1768, Daniel Roberts; and Jane, who m. Richard, son of Benjamin and Hannah Furbish of L.

While there is no written proof that our Mary was the daughter of Samuel, I believe the circumstantial evidence is strong. There is also the fact that our Great Grandmother Mary married a McCrillis and so did John as stated in the reference above (whom I believe is her brother); therefore I put Mary as the daughter of Samuel Canney in our family tree.

That being said, there are records which take the Canney line back to England and to Stratford Upon Avon, home of William and Anne Shakespeare.

This therefore, is our tie through marriage to the youngest daughter of the Great Bard himself, William Shakespeare.


Relationship Chart


Judith
Shakespeare (1582 - 1662)
wife of our 10th great grand uncle Thomas Quinney (1588 - 1661)

Richard Quinney (1557 - 1602)
Father of Thomas

William Kenney (1593 - 1653)
Son of Richard

Thomas Canney (1610 - 1681)
Son of William

Thomas Canney (1639 - 1677)
Son of Thomas

Samuel Canney (1677 - 1735)
Son of Thomas

Samuel Canney (1699 - 1790)
Son of Samuel

Mary Canney (1745 - 1828)
Daughter of Samuel

John Kenney McCrillis (1785 - 1868)
Son of Mary

Joseph E. McCrillis (1808 - 1890)
Son of John

Isabella Denora McCrillis (1851 - 1896)
Daughter of Joseph E.

Vesta Althea Dennis (1892 - 1978)
Daughter of Isabella Denora

Voilet Mae Pierce (1918 - 1987)
Daughter of Vesta Althea

Violet Pierce married Walter Mattson
to
Luella, Linda, John, Marvin
to
Us


Anne and William Shakespeare's younger daughter, Judith, the youngest of the Bard's children was betrothed to Thomas Quiney. Anne and William would have initially approved of the betrothal of Judith and Thomas as Quiney came from a good family. In view of the changes in his family's circumstances, and his own advancing years and possibly declining health, William Shakepeare prudently drafts his will on January 25th 1616, a few days before Judith and Quiney's marriage. Judith married Thomas Quiney, a vintner and tavern owner from Stratford, on February 10th 1616. Judith was 31 and Thomas Quiney was 27 years of age. The initial approval of the marriage quickly changed with the scandalous news that Thomas Quiney had made another girl pregnant. Anne must have been desperately worried about Judith. The scandal would have spread through Stratford. It then appeared that Quiney did not receive the special licence necessary for a wedding during lent before his marriage. The situation was really serious and on March 12th Judith and Thomas were excommunicated. William must have been mortified with the turn of events. He summoned his lawyer and promptly modifies and signs his will on March 25th 1616. The modification of the will was to ensure that Judith would receive a sum of money (300 pounds) inherited in her own name. Shakespeare leaves the bulk of his fortune to his daughter, Susanna. On March 26th Quiney was prosecuted for 'carnal copulation' with a woman named Margaret Wheeler, who had died in childbirth that month along with her baby by Quiney. He confessed and was sentenced to perform public penance. His penalty, however, was commuted to a small fine of five shillings and private penance.

The Signature of Judith Shakespeare

Thomas and Judith Quiney had three children giving the Bard three Quiney grandchildren:
Shakespeare Quiney was born in Nov 1616. He died in infancy, aged 6 months, in May 1617.
Richard Quiney was born in Oct 1617. He died in Jan 1639 aged 21 (possibly of the plague).
Thomas Quiney was born in Jan 1619. He also died in Jan 1639, the same month as his brother, aged 19 (possibly of the plague). So none of the children of Judith survived to continue the Shakespeare line.